Academic
editing
You know the research. I help your reader follow the argument. If your meaning is unclear, I ask before changing the text.
- Research papers and dissertations
- Scholarly books and chapters
- Nominations and institutional texts
Hi folks, my name is Adam Frick. I am a professional teacher, trainer, writer and editor. More fundamentally, I help writers and speakers to maximise their effectiveness through English. Whether you are a teenage BA student, a seasoned postdoc or a professional in private industry, my goal is the same: to make you and your skillset as clear, competent and cohesive as possible.
No shortcuts. No ornamentation. No busywork. I am here to help you put your own abilities on full display.
Effective English provides text solutions for any need you might have, with longstanding relationships with academia, government and private industry.What changes?A SHORTER ALTERNATIVE
I edit texts and teach writing for academia, government and private industry.
I propose a new consensus non-native grammar for native and non-native users alike. English needs conventions that serve its global majority. Every writer shares the responsibility for making meaning clear.
Think of choosing a jacket for an appointment. Your writing needs the same judgement. Match the complexity to your reader and the occasion.
I help writers and speakers communicate effectively in English, drawing on longstanding relationships with academia, government and private industry.
This version restores the reference to established relationships while keeping a personal voice. The broader description makes room for work beyond editing and writing instruction, but tells a visitor less about the specific services. I would choose between these versions after considering the page, the reader and the information that comes next.
You know your subject; my job is to help you share that knowledge. Perhaps you are putting the finishing touches on a paper, finding your way through a book or preparing to speak to colleagues. We begin with what you want your audience to understand, then work out how your English can help.
You know the research. I help your reader follow the argument. If your meaning is unclear, I ask before changing the text.
I edit the language across your manuscript. A shared style guide keeps decisions consistent. You can review my questions as we work.
We work with real sentences. You try a revision and discuss the difference. I explain the choices so you can use the same skills again.
A shorter sentence is not automatically a better sentence. Sometimes a reader needs more explanation; sometimes an unusual turn of phrase gives a passage its character. The published examples below let you compare a few possibilities and see the reasoning behind my choices. Pay particular attention to the literary opening, where I would keep the original.
Long, complex phrases tend to come at the ends of clauses; this is called “endweight.”
English often places longer phrases towards clause endings, a tendency known as end-weight.
Wasow describes a pattern, then gives the pattern a name in a separate clause. My revision brings the name alongside the description, so the reader can follow one continuous explanation. Notice the word “often”. English has tendencies as well as rules, and an edit should preserve that distinction.
I have chosen these examples from published sources, with a link beneath each comparison. My revisions demonstrate an editorial decision rather than work commissioned by the original publisher. You can read the source and decide whether my explanation makes sense.
Before changing a sentence, I want to know what you need your reader to understand. The answer gives us a reason to choose one version over another. A revision earns its place by helping you communicate that meaning.
Your writing should still sound like you. A good edit can make a point easier to follow while keeping the humour or emphasis that gives the passage character. I explain my suggestions so you can decide which changes belong in your work.
You deserve more than a page of corrections. When I suggest a substantial change, I explain the problem and show how the revision addresses that problem. You can question the reasoning, weigh the alternatives and use the same principle in your next piece of writing.
Think of a sentence as a little train. The subject sets off first, followed closely by the main action, with the extra detail travelling behind. That order gives your reader a way into the sentence before the heavier material arrives.
Cost, access and support after publication shape the team’s decision.
By the time you reach the action in this sentence, you have already worked through three items. I use this example to show why I prefer a compact subject near the beginning. Use the button to see how the same information can follow a different route.
Explore the principle.My work takes me from university classrooms to the pages of scholarly books. The scale changes, but I still need to understand what the writer wants to say and what the reader needs to know. Here are a few examples of that work.
When I edit a substantial scholarly book, I keep the whole manuscript in mind while working through each sentence. I maintain a style guide so a decision made early in the book remains consistent in later chapters. If a passage raises a question about meaning, I take that question back to the author.
I edited an English-language nomination for membership of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. A nomination needs to convey the significance of someone’s work without leaving the reader to guess why a detail matters. My attention went to the language, tone and clarity of the case being made.
In my academic writing courses, I help writers understand how a reader follows an argument. We work through examples together, looking closely at what a sentence says and how a paragraph develops. The discussion matters as much as the revision. I want participants to leave knowing why a change helps and when the same approach might help again.

I spend much of my working life helping other people find the words they need. I also write fiction, so I know the feeling of having a passage in mind and struggling to get that passage onto the page. Moving between teaching and editing lets me approach the same problem from different directions. I can help you improve the text in front of you and understand the choices behind the changes.
I also like to flex my own muscles as a writer. My Substack gives you a chance to see that side of my work. Come have a read and see what I get up to beyond the classroom and the editor’s desk.
Read my writing on Substack.Away from work, I am a father of four and enjoy exploring with my children and our dog. Our adventures take us from the beach to city streets and mountain paths. The photographs below give you a glimpse of that side of my life.
Find me on LinkedIn.



I have plenty to say about writing, as my students will tell you. These essays explain the principles I teach and the reasons behind my recommendations. Start with the manifesto, then follow whichever topic speaks to a problem you recognise in your own work.
I propose a new consensus grammar for native and non-native users alike. The manifesto explains why English’s global role calls for that agreement. The practical essays below show how the proposal translates into choices a writer can examine.
Read the manifesto.A sentence can carry a complicated idea without making the reader struggle through complicated grammar. I begin with the core, then show how you can build around that structure. The goal is room for your meaning and a clear route for your reader.
Read the first essay.You do not need a polished brief to get in touch. Tell me what you are working on, who you want to reach and what is giving you trouble. Include your deadline if you have one, and we can talk through the next step.
adam.effective.english@gmail.com